Dinesh D'Souza and "The End of Racism"

In 1995, Dinesh D'Souza published a controversial bestseller titled The End of Racism. The book discusses how America is no longer fighting racism because people have simply accepted that racism exists, thus stifled progress to prove such ideas wrong. Dinesh D'Souza explores questions regarding racial prejudice and whether or not such a characteristic is innate or culturally acquired. Although I could not find D'Souza's answer to this question, I believe that every individual recognizes racial differences, but I do not believe that racism is an inborn trait. I know that I sometimes use racial profiling and I am sure that this is not naturally a part of me. I most likely observed it in movies or perhaps, unfortunately, from my family. I do not believe that racism started with differences in color; I believe it began with cultural divides and people trying to comprehend why cultures differ. I believe racism developed from confusions and misunderstandings that can occur from language barriers. It was easier to label someone as being strange or foreign rather than trying to find common ground.

Franz Fanon

Franz Fanon was born July 20, 1925. He lived a relatively short life, dying December 6, 1961 after being diagnosed with leukemia.
He wrote multiple books, including Black Skin, White Masks and The Wretched of the Earth. In The Wretched of the Earth, he analyzes the role played by race, class, and violence in the fight for freedom. This is his most fiery work, saying that in order to overthrow the white dominance of colonies "absolute violence" is required. He has been established as one of the leading an anti-colonial thinkers of the 20th century. His works have helped drive many of the anti-colonial movements in the last 40 years.

Dinesh D'Souza... Religion

Dinesh D'Souza was born on April 25, 1961 in India. He is a writer and a public speaker. His most recent book, "What's so Great About Christianity?" led to a lot of discussion and debates about religion. In his book, Dinesh tries to proves with facts why religion in still believable with new scientific discoveries occurring. I recommend you watch this video to gain a sense of D'Souza's point of view in one of his debates. 

I found this video very interesting and hard to argue without being bias (which is the only way to go, unless you have proven facts). The questions "where do we come from?" and "where are we going?" are answered by the many religions in the world. The only problem is which one is right. There is no fixed answer to the two questions above, but religions provide answers we can choose to believe in.    In this video D'Souza tries to explain the very controversial issue of religion in his opinion . Even thought he doesn't touch on every aspect of the questions presented, he does a good job in explaining the idea of "suspend[ing] your disbelief until you evaluate something critically."    This I believe is a good point that is merely saying "don't judge a book by its cover." You shouldn't judge something before you  have experienced it. After you experience that specific religion, then you can decide if it fits your worldview or not. 

From this video, we can see that D'Souza  finds  the worldview of an atheist to be illogical.What I find interesting and perhaps controversial is how D'Souza describes an atheist's belief about religion..."There's ten of them (religions) and they can't all be right, so Ill choose none of the above."  I'm not sure I understand exactly why he believes the worldview of an atheist is irrational, but he does bring up some interesting points in this video and perhaps I would like to look at the book he has written to learn more about his opinion. 

Being Normal

This cartoon depicts the one-sided view that these leaders or groups have. I found it very interesting because it says “normal” people. Like many of us have argued, normal does not have an exact definition. Nobody is normal. And if there is such a thing as normal, the boundaries are, for sure, not clearly defined. These leaders took advantage of that and molded the boundaries to fit their standards. In each of these cases the normal was not being a Jew, black, guy or some other group these leaders decided to team up against. Besides taking advantage of the lack of boundaries of the word normal, they also took advantage of the population's want to be normal. The majority of the people want to be normal and fit in. Many of them would do anything to fit in and the leaders knew they would most likely not retaliate because of this. Overall, I like this cartoon because it clearly demonstrates the power these people used to manipulate the simple definition of the word “normal,” into an excuse for their unforgivable actions. It doesn't only display how they were able to manipulate, but how the people were able to be manipulated. This picture reminds of what people would do because of a simple desire to be "normal."

Holocaust: Lots and lots of bad yet some good

Today at assembly Rabia talked about her experience of World War II and the Holocaust. I thought that it was lucky that she came to talk while we were studying the Holocaust. One point that she made that I hadn't considered was pondering whether I would have hid Jews from the Nazis during WWII. Would I risk the life of my family to help save the life/lives of others? It is a large risk to take but many Gentiles did during the Holocaust. Not only did many Gentiles hide Jews to help save their lives, but also were kind and helpful towards the Jews unlike the majority of Nazi officers. We witnessed one of these helpers in Maus II when we meet the Hungarian Mancie who helps relay messages between Anja and Vladek. I had never truly thought of the helpful Gentiles during the Holocaust because one usually thinks of the concentration camps or ghettos. It is truly important to recogonize both the good and the bad but to also understand different points of view in each situation. The one thing that I truly took away from her talk was the fact that although lots of bad things were going on during the Holocaust some people went out of there way to help others, these people risked their lifes to uphold their moral and ethical duty.

17 year old girl flogged by Taliban

While reading the New York Times, I discovered a shocking article regarding the Taliban, “Video of Taliban Flogging Girl draws Widespread Outrage.” Reading further into the article, I noted that the 17 year old girl denied the request to marry a Taliban commander and was publicly flogged as a result of her actions. In our history class we recently discussed the Taliban and in particular its control of the Swat Valley in Pakistan. This event took place in Swat Valley - which is the region Pakistan gave to the Taliban.

In other articles we have read about concerning the Taliban, women have no rights.  Even with that knowledge this article still comes across as a shock. Someone watching the event was filming with their video recorder on their cell-phone, while the young girl yells phrases such as, “For God’s sake, please stop, stop it, I am dying.” It doesn’t specify who put the video on the Internet, I imagine (and hope) it was someone who was trying to show the world what the Taliban is really about and this video is just one plea of help.  

"The Lines a German Won't Cross"

I found an interesting article in the NY Times about modern Germany. "The Lines a German Won't Cross" discusses the way Germans strictly adhere to so many unwritten social and legal rules that it is astounding when compared to the U.S. or other European countries. The author states that he can't blame Germans for Ordnung (order) or, "the unwritten road map of one society's concerted effort to permanently banish the instability and violence that have marked its history". He says it's understandable by looking at their past; they let "a little charismatic speaker with an even littler mustache" order them around and it was followed with horror and chaos. 

However; Germany may be doing well now, but I think it was partly their strict adherence to the rules that led to their downfall of WWII. Germans blindly followed irrational laws and social regulations, like boycotting all Jewish stores or not speaking up when people heard the terrors of ghettos and camps. They blindly followed a man who was crazy with his rules and where did that leave them? Maybe if they weren't so focused on staying within the boundaries, someone would have questioned the leadership more. It is a lesson to all of us not just to follow the rules because they are there and perhaps we should think for ourselves a little bit more. 

Below is the cartoon that went along with the article